592 Belden Ave.
Camarillo, CA 93010
My search began for this man as a family myth, or I thought it was a
myth, for quite some time. After my Aunt Tenny and my older
sister Ione died, there was no one who was actively pursuing much
of the family, except my niece, Clydene. She was not retired and
was a very busy person. She had provided me with charts that she
had prepared for her church activity and I was very grateful. I
wanted to know more, it was a desire within me that I had harbored
since childhood. I never had grandparents to know and love, and I
wanted some. Thanks to the Lamar County Genealogy Society of
Paris Texas. They have provided me the clues and the assistance. It
has been four long years, but the work and the waiting has been
worth it.
I have discovered many grandparents, but am not yet content. I am still searching. In this attempt
at recording Robert Joseph Pirtle, I will try to connect his Civil War activities with his family
records, oral history, and the events in the society of those times.
His father was born in KY, in 23 June 1809; his mother was born in TN, 6 April 1808, and he was
born in TN on 22 May, 1832. He married Elizabeth A. Brummette in 1855, who was born in AR
in 1838. So his family had migrated from KY to TN, TN to AR, and AR to TX. At the time of
his death, he was the father of a large family, and a prosperous farmer. His physical health had
not been very good after he returned from the Civil War. He died seven years after he returned
home. (His father died three years later on Christmas day, 1875). R. J. left his widow with seven
children, possibly eight, I am still searching for 'Joe Lee'. The two oldest were girls, 12 and 14
years old. The war hurt many people, for generations after, and our family lived with this mystery
of a deserter, until now. In the Ron Brothers CSA records, I have found some information that
can provide a resolution to our wondering.
Robert Joseph Pirtle (R. J. Pirtle / Robert J. Pirtle/ R. J. Pyrtle) seems to have such an array of
clues to unknown events, in his military CSA records. I feel a great need to solve as many of the
mysteries as I can, or at least let some light into his past life, in my attempt to write a
comprehensive biography. I have tried to sort the events and explain the brief entries in the war
journals, using my own logic and our family's oral history.
I have successfully copied, with my trusty computer, a family photo, of R. J., that has been loved
for over four generations. It is attached, and obviously, was taken sometime around the Civil War
years. As his great granddaughter I am proud of his countenance. His face shows strength of
character, especially the strong chin, which I have inherited. It has caused me many
confrontations in my lifetime (both inside my family circle and out). The photo of R. J. is typical
of the time. A suit and tie have been painted on , so we do not know how he was dressed. His
image has been touched-up, by the photographer, until it is difficult to determine his complexion.
The family believes that he was actually not as dark as the photo displays. He is said to have
looked like Custer (which we do not consider a compliment), in that he was blonde, blue eyed,
and wore the style of hair and mustache that was popular at that time. The CSA records have
been reviewed, but there is no personal description of him. I suppose the personal description
information, required by all our documents in this day, was not a practice they had time for in
those days.
The earliest date, on the CSA Texas records is 19 June 1861, but the family arrived in Lamar
County around 1856. This was the era of mixed events in the land. There was a conflict in Utah
between the Army, the Indians and the Mormans. The Mormans had killed 120 immigrants
leaving only 17 children alive. They claimed the immigrants had killed their leader, Joseph Smith.
There was a Financial panic, it resulted in 4,932 companies failing. Railroads went bankrupt.
Same things we worry about today. There was a sharp increase in violence in Texas. A dispute
arose about a matter so trivial that no one remembered what started it. They called it the Cart
War. There were kidnaping, beatings and murders, so frequent they were considered 'Common
Place'. The Army in Texas had been using Camels for their beasts of burden, to help the Second
Cavalry. They decided to transfer them to California. The soldiers said they would not miss the
smelly things. There was even problems with Nicaragua, a man named William Walker, Cornelius
Vanderbilt, and the States, about running that country. That news appears to be not much
different than our news today.
I shall assume my great grandfather was not too concerned with those other events. He occupied,
during the years from 1856 to 1861, with getting married, obtaining a head-right (or purchasing
land), settling down, and beginning farming. Obtaining land at that time was easier than it is
today, but our understanding of their process is not easy. I have a copy of one of the land
transactions. I quote, in part, the description of the sale. '....(the description of property is).
Beginning at the South East corner of said original survey a stake on Davis line, from which a
post oak marked X bears South 14 degrees, West 3 varas, and another marked X bears South 15
degrees East, 4 varas thence North with said line 220 2/3 poles, a stake, and two red oaks and 1
hickory. The South East corner, of said original survey, from which a post oak marked with a
blaze and 2 chops bears South 4 varas thence East with the South boundary line 142 poles the
place of beginning, containing two hundred acres, be the same more or less....' No wonder there
were many land conflicts, cut down a tree and the whole world went mad.
There was always a confrontation within the family about the property; that had been deeded to
my grandmother, Mary Pirtle Lyons, by her father Robert Joseph Pirtle. Not that we wanted it,
but that we wanted to know where it was, and to solve the mystery of why she was not allowed
to keep it. Her husband, John M. Lyons, rejected any attempt to find out about it, saying it was
American Indian land and did not belong to us (meaning her, I guess). I have not been able to put
any light on that problem, but I believe it to be her part of her fathers property the children were
to receive upon the remarriage of her mother. The is property could have been purchased from an
American Indian, or it could have been his wife's heritage. Elizabeth A. Brummette Pirtle, Mary's
mother and R. J.'s wife, is said to have been part Native American, but that will be another story.
This is to be Robert Joseph Pirtle's story, as much as I am able to determine it.
I have to assume that all the CSA records, of Robert J. Pirtle, are his, because I have found no
other person whose name is similar. His two brothers, James and Jenkins, I find it difficult to
determine which records belong to which brother. They may be combined, but this is R. J.'s
story. The use of the initials J. B., by both of them, at various times, is apparently the basis of the
problem. I, also, believe that the record of a James N. Pirtle is actually James J. Pirtle, with a
miss reading of the middle initial N. It is obvious that extended research, on my part, is required
to fully document those brothers, but my great grandfather is my priority, and rightly so.
R. J. volunteered for the Hill's Lamar Cavalry, Company number 2, organized on 10 June 1861.
That is the oldest military record that I have seen concerning. The record indicates he was
assigned as a Private. It was under the command of Captain James Hill, and located at
Persimmon Grove, Lamar County, TX. The record was filed on 19 June 1861, and states that the
unit was part of the Texas Militia Battalion organized under the act to incorporate volunteer
companies, that was approved on 15 February 1858. The History of Lamar County, by A. W.
Neville, was published by the North Texas Publishing Company in 1937. His record appears on
pages 120 and 121, as a member of the Lamar Cavalry Number 2 (I have heard it referred to as
the Second Cavalry). This was a period that would have been difficult for him, as a family man,
his wife was expecting their third child, which arrived on 5 September 1861.
It is recorded that he mustered in on the Company Roll of Burnet's Battalion of Texas Sharp
Shooters. The record indicates that he was 30 years old. (He would have been 30 years old on
May 22, 1862). The Muster-In Roll was 10 December 1862. (That would be correct according
to his birth date). How frightening for his family to face this separation just two weeks before
their Christmas celebration. I will have to do more research to determine how he went from Hill's
Cavalry to Burnet's Sharp Shooters, but one may have been organizing, and the other an
authorized unit going to war. He may have been in a hurry to participate and chose to change
units. He could have been negotiating a higher rank, or rating. He was a private in the other unit,
and appears here as an officer and as a sergeant in the others. Those variances, in ranks and
ratings, may be errors in interpretation. The writing 'of old' is hard for us 'of today' to read. He
was Mustered-in for three years of service, on 1 August 1862, at Camp Jackson, Lamar County,
TX, as a 3rd Lt, from further review of his records it appears that the rank or rating may have
been Sgt. rather than Lt. because he went from 3rd Sgt., to 2nd Sgt., to Sgt., in the records as
time progressed. He was assigned to Company B of the 1st Battalion which is referred to as
Burnet's Battalion (this is taken from the National Archives Microfilm Roll 323, #261.)
To leave his family, must have been a troublesome thing for him to do, even though he was
dedicated to supporting his beliefs with his personal sacrifice of life and limb. He must have been
very concerned with the war, for him to make the decision to leave his family and join his three
brothers, to make the family foursome, that charged into the war. Isaac, their father, had to see
his four oldest sons go off to war, leaving him with a great deal of responsibility, at the age of 53,
which was considered old at that time. R. J. Pirtle's youngest child, was a daughter named
Eunicy. She had been named after his mother, who died in 1857. Eunicy had been born on 5
September 1861, while he was planning to leave. Leaving a wife, with the small child, must have
been difficult for him, as it surely was for her. She was left with three children, the oldest was
only a six year old girl.
He remained in the area only a short while, as he got his affairs in order, and prepared to join in
the actual fighting. The years he was away fighting, running, and being ill, were very difficult
years not only for him, but for those at home as well. Food was short and there was no help with
the farming, the children had to become adults and work with their mother to have anything to
eat. Luckily my great grandmother, Elizabeth A. Brummette Pirtle, was a very strong woman.
She lived many years after her husbands death. My mother Zuola Lyons Galyean, born in 1883,
was lucky enough to have known her, and remembered the stories she told of her husbands war
tribulations.
In the information in the Roll dated December through February 1963, the date of 31 October
1862, was given as his first payday. He was paid by Captain E. J. Shelton. Captain Shelton was
considered the Quartermaster and part of his duty was to pay the soldiers. He was the only
officer that was recorded on the pay records for the days that followed. Those entries included
whether soldier was present and sometimes it indicated what the payee's current rank or rating
was. The Gatling gun was developed that year, but was not produced in sufficient numbers to be
used in the war. It had been developed with the thought that it was so horrible, men would be
turned away from war. It did not work that way, a form of it is still being used on US ships
today, mainly the firing projectiles are different. The war events created agony throughout the
land and some of that agony is still in our society today.
To quote Adlai Stevenson, 'A hungry man is not a free man.' Our land was teeming with men
(and women and children) who were not free before the war, and there were many more after the
war. Hunger is still a social issue, even as we approach the 21st Century. We, in this 'Land of the
Free,' remain faced with the problem of the person who is not free.
Many trivial things happened, too. Fashionable uniforms were developed by the North and the
South. There was the emergence of the Great Coat, and Overcoat, some versions are still in
fashion today. There were financial events that reverberate still. Events that we've seldom heard
about. One, that is in current controversy, income tax. The first nation-wide income tax was
approved by congress. Gad, has it been in effect that long, since 1863? For incomes of $800.00
or more a levy of 3% was collected. I would gladly accept that today, but in those days, it must
have been shockingly high.
The CSA consolidated three month report March through April 1863 indicated that R. J. was
present on 18 February 1863 and appeared as a 2nd Sgt. There is a statement that he was absent
(I assume from duty) and was sent to the hospital on 27 April 1863. He was paid on 30 April and
appeared as a 2nd Sgt. It does not indicate if Captain Shelton paid him in the hospital, or on duty.
There was another entry for May through June indicated an absence and an added remark, that he
was sick at Port Hudson, dated 6 May 1863. It indicates that his pay on 30 April 1863 was the
last he received. He appears to be absent at the other times indicated for payday. The record does
not indicate if R. J. was still ill. He had only been participating in the fighting less than a year. It
had seemed to him that he had been there for most of his life. They fought in deplorable
conditions.
The Northern troops had come by ship and captured New Orleans, the main port from which their
supplies could be delivered. I am sure you have hear of Farragut and his accomplishments. R. J.
repeatedly told of how hungry they were, and how they were forced to eat anything they could
find. That search for water and food resulted in many of them becoming very ill, with severe
diarrhea, vomiting, and other side effects. One of his brothers had to resign his commission and
leave the service because he could not recover. After 10 days leave to recuperate, he still had the
problem with which he had suffered, diarrhea for two months. I am surprised he survived. I
believe that he was James B. Pirtle, who was born in 1830. I, also, believe his illness was fatal,
he died in the war or shortly after. He was not in the Census records for 1860, his wife was a
widow living with his younger brother.
Great grandfather said that when he got out of the hospital and was returned to the fighting,
everyone was starving. He was an especially resourceful man, and when he found a cow
wandering around their area, he shot it. He butchered it and got it ready for his unit to cook and
eat. Everyone ate it and relished the meal, including his commanding officer. Then the next day
he was brought up for Courts Martial. He was charged for killing the cow because is belonged to
a Southern family. With the fighting that was going on around New Orleans, Baton Rouge and
Port Hudson, who could tell who owned the cow. He was shocked when leg irons were fastened
on, and he put in the jail at Port Hudson, La.
As Stonewall Jackson died of his wounds he received, 6 May 1863, at Chancelorsville. He is
quoted as asking to be taken across the river to rest on the other side under the shade of a tree.
He never recovered and died on 10 May 1863. When R. J. decided to escape, it was around the
end of May 1863. I am sure he would have like to have been allowed to cross the river and rest
under the shade of a tree, but he was on the run. Luckily, he was a ventriloquist who had
perfected many sounds and that helped him to managed his escape. He used them to divert the
attention of the jailors, and to escape. His sounds of a javalina (Wild Boar), were very effective,
because they were of a very vicious animal, and therefore, considered dangerous to anyone on
foot. The searchers ran away from that sound. R. J. found rocks and scraps of iron and used
them to cut off his leg irons. It took days to be free of them. He went where ever he could to
escape being caught by the unit that was searching for him. He went through swamps and
crawled on his belly. He tried to go directly home, an incorrect decision. He was caught on 12
June 1863 and they transferred him to New Orleans, as indicated by the List of Prisoners sent
down from Port Hudson, dated 15 June 1863. The prisoners were sent to the Provost Marshall
General's Office, New Orleans, La. He never mentioned another escape, so perhaps he was
captured by the North when they continued to take the areas around New Orleans. I must check
to see if there was a Southern jail around Lafouche (Lafourche). Otherwise he escaped again and
was hiding in the swamps when the Northern Soldiers found him.
The records do not show why he was in the Lafourche (a bayou), south of New Orleans area, but
that was where the Northern Soldiers captured him, on 23 June 1863. He was a Prisoner of War
for a short time and was paroled. It was customary for the North to lecture their Southern
prisoners, to threaten them with death if they were caught fighting again. They would then free
them, with directions to return to their homes. Most of them did as they were told, feeling that
the war was lost. I believe R. J. would have done that, after the way he was treated for provide
food for his group.
There is another quarterly report in the record for July through August, 1863 indicating that he is
still missing, but it appears that R. J. returned to his unit, thinking they would allow him to
continue his duties, if the record of clothing issue is correct. The record confuses me here, for I
do not believe he would have taken that action. I believe he would have returned home when the
North released him. The record of clothing, he received on 8 July 1863, confirms his return, but
not his status at that time. Was he still a prisoner, or was he allowed to return to his unit? The
next day after he signed for the clothing issue, Port Hudson surrendered to the Northern Army, 9
July 1863. It is reported in the strategy journals about the war that the fall of Port Hudson
completed the Union campaigns for control of the Mississippi and split the Confederacy in two.
Poor R. J., he was there in the thick of it, and unable to help as he had signed up to do. There
was another quarterly report for September through October on record and it also indicated that
R. J. was absent. The end of the CSA record gave me the information, our family had long been
seeking.
Whatever the real truth, R. J. did escape, as the report indicates. He traveled the dangerous
journey home. He again crawled, hid, and successfully ran from both sides of the warring group.
He traveled at night and slept where ever he could in the day. He also ate what he could find, but
the family was familiar with the native plants that were edible, so with rabbits about, he made it
home. My grandson identifies with our R. J., because he had survival training at the Air Force
Academy and thought he would starve to death, but he learned to eat off the land, as did his great
great great grandfather.
R. J. arrived home very ill and his wife treated him as best she could. It was not a joyous occasion for the family because, he insisted on staying in the cellar, for he believed everyone was searching for him. He wanted to stay there until the war was over. It put great pressure on the family, especially children. The family had to pretend that he was still in the war. For the children it was difficult, because they were so glad to have him home. He would get up and work in the fields at night, to try and help the family finish their crops, for it was harvest time when he arrived.
The next year, 1864, the war was still raging, but he could not hide for long because his wife
became pregnant with another son. Her reputation would have been ruined, and for a woman of
that day, it would have ruined the lives of her daughters as well as hers. He had to come out of
the cellar. He decided to pretend to return, legally. It was not as difficult as he had thought, for
he was very ill, and never did really get well. So everyone assumed that he was too ill to continue
fighting. The secret never got out, or perhaps no one really cared, for they began to wonder why
the terrible struggle ever happened.
There war celebration, as much as they could afford. Their first son, Robert Joseph Pirtle, (Jr.)
was born on 24 July 1864. R. J. kept to himself as much as he could, and did not participate in
the politics of the area. Some of the news he heard pleased him. General Lee was still fighting at
the Rapidan River, and the news was good. He had tried to lead his men into the fighting, but
they refused to let him, shouting, 'Go back General Lee, Go Back.' They valued his life well
above theirs.
Also, far away in Europe there was a sea battle between the C.S.S. Alabama and the U.S.S.
Kearsarge. The Alabama was in the harbor at Cherbourg, France for repairs. The Kearsarge
captain found out about it and challenged the Captain of the Alabama to a fight. The Alabama's
officers were Confederate, but the crew was English. The battle was observed from the cliffs by
15,000 spectators and special excursion trains that came from Paris. Before this battle the
Alabama had created tremendous damage to the Northern ships. They had captured or damaged
over 60 Northern Merchant ships, before losing this battle, perhaps their need for repairs was one
factor. It is so hard to imagine the fighting so far away from our shores. It is more puzzling yet,
to imagine people watching (by choice) a war. There were crowds watching in the South, at the
beginning, when they were sure the Confederacy would win in a short time.
The war continued and so did the political campaigning. Nevada was quickly admitted to the Union to allow them to vote in the elections. They became the 36th state. In 1865 the War was over, but the real anguish of the war had just begun, especially in the South. Even in Texas, I note on the Brother's Web Site, there is a list of indigent there in 1865, I was pleased not to find any of my family on that list. I am thankful for their strength, family support, and perhaps the need to 'do it on their own', that I have inherited. I am sure they went hungry and in patched clothes, but they survived for the most part, and went on to complete their life's work. It was a sad time at R. J.'s home too, not only was their problems the same as others, but that year their Eunicy died, she was only four short years old. Most, of those years she spent without a father.
The war ended and many things began to take its place in the events of the day. In march of
1867, Nebraska became the 37th state, and in April Alaska was purchased. Carnegie started his
Pullman Company, although he had build his first pullman car in 1863, which indicates his mind
was not on the war, but the comfort for his travel. Later he developed it for the other travelers
and it is still with the railroads today, yet not as comfortable, I think.
The suffragists began their movement, which reverberates today, in many forms. The mail order
business began, which was a great help to women. They had a choice of buying their clothes and
other needs and did not have to weave, knit and sew everything for the family. Even 'men things'
could be purchased. They had guns, buggies, such a variety of things, it is hard to imagine. I got
a reproduced copy of the Sears book and it was amazing. They eventually sold houses, cars, and
horses and saddles. Elizabeth A. Brummette Pirtle must have welcomed it especially. It would
have helped her to dress her seven children. It was part of the lives of the settlers who continued
into the west. That movement required the government to maintain the Cavalry, which had a
constant job of protecting them. Posts were established to provide a place of safety. The fort
soon developed into places of social activities. The catalogue provided a means for the settlers to
have the things they needed. They desired to make a satisfactory appearance, even in their
frontier society. It was one of the things that helped them to keep in touch with a civilization that
they left.
At the time of the 1870 Lamar County Census R. J. had two more children. His brother James B.
Pirtle was dead, his brother Jenkins (Jenks) was married, had four children, and lived on a farm
near his father Isaac. Jenks was caring for his brother James B. Pirtle's family. James was listed
on the 1860 census but is missing from the 1870 census. I believe he died in the war, but I have
not found his death records, yet. His brother Isaac Newton was living close by, as was their
father Isaac who still had three of his children living at home. It was the time of the Jesse James
Gang, Buffalo Bill Cody, and a skating rink fad. The skating fad reached from New York, and
Rhode Island to Cheyenne, Wyoming. Whistler painted his mother at that time, and Burbank
grew his better potato. It was a changing world, but has it ever stopped changing?
Another son was born the year J. R. died. He was Joseph A. Pirtle, born in 1872 and he has
created another mystery for me. I have family photos of Joe Lee, but assumed he is older than
Joseph A. So far I have found no records of any other Joseph Pirtle that is related to this family,
nor have I connected these two.
Our family knows that R. J. was a good citizen, he never gave anyone any trouble. His memory is
not marred by any tale of disagreement with anyone. His writing of his will indicated that the first
thing that he wanted to be done, was to pay any debts he owed. He was a caring husband and
father. He specifically worded his will so that the children could share in his estate, but provided
for his wife, even the event that she would remarry. Although his will was well worded and was
probated, there was a contest of control of property later. It resulted from the children's reaction
to their step-father. They did not approve of the handling of their estate after their mother's
marriage. The two of the youngest boys, who were still at home, went to court to contest the
handling of their estate, and to ask that their sister's husband be made their guardian. Robert
Joseph and Isaac Jefferson asked that my grandfather, John M. Lyons, be appointed, by the court
to be their guardian. Their mother contested the insinuation that she was not a proper mother. In
formal legal documents the court stated that the decision, that was made, concerned the property
control, only. She was contented as she would never let anyone take her children away, or erode
her authority over them, after all, she was on of the wives that survived the war, caring for her
children without help from a husband. Her name, as a mother, she cared about, but she cared
little for the property. The family remained friends, there are pictures of gatherings at the
youngest son's house. It appeared everyone was there. Great Grandfather Robert J. Pirtle would
have been pleased.
It is difficult for me to explain how happy I was when I read the last word of his Confederate
service record. There was the word "DESERTER." Although I knew what the word was
supposed to mean, but, to me it meant the lost had been found. I knew that this was the man our
great grandmother had loved so much. She was still relating stories about him, long after his
death, and her remarriage. My life's mystery was solved. The family members, who knew all the
details, were long ago gone to be with him, and the younger of us, that were left, had only dim
childhood memories of the wonderful stories we heard. No one was sure of the details or the
exact names of those long ago family members. (My grandchildren recently told a friend, that
asked what was their grandfather's name. They joyously replied, 'Grampa'.) Memories and
stories faded along the 126 year trail the family followed West. I had feared I would never know.
Now I know and shall tell everyone. I am proud of him, and glad he deserted before he starved to
death. His cause had long before been lost. Now I have found our War Hero. He has received
no ticker tape parade down Broadway, but I propose that he deserved it more than some of those
who did.
Robert Joseph Pirtle is buried in Forest Hill Cemetery, in the Forest Hill Community of Lamar
County, Texas.
Private, R. J. Pirtle is found listed in Lamar County Deed Book L, p. 324, as a member of Hill's
Lamar Cavalry Company No. 2, organized 10 Jun 1861 under Captain James Hill, at Persimmon
Grove, Lamar Co., TX, filed for the record on 19 Jun 1861. The document states the Company
"is a volunteer Company and attached to the... Texas Militia Battalion organized under the act to
incorporate volunteer companies approved February the 15th, 1858."
R. J. Pyrtle is found in THE HISTORY OF LAMAR COUNTY, by A. W. Neville, North Texas
Publishing Co., 1937, pp. 120-121 as a member of Lamar Cavalry No. 2.
Robert J. Pirtle, 3rd Lt., Co. B, age 30, appears on Company Muster-in Roll, Burnet's Battalion
Texas Sharp Shooters, 1st Battalion Texas Sharp Shooters, National Archives Microfilm Roll
323, #261.
Roll dated Camp Jackson, Lamar Co., TX, 10 Dec 1862, joined for duty at Fannin Co., TX, 1
Aug 1862 by C. Z. Bridge for 3 years of service.
Roll dated Dec - Feb 1863: last paid by Capt. E. J. Shelton on 31 Oct 1862, present, appears as
3rd Sgt.
Roll dated Mar - Apr 1863: last paid by Capt. E. J. Shelton on 28 Feb 1863, appears as 2nd Sgt.,
absent, sent to General Hospital 27 Apr 1863. Roll dated May - Jun 1863: last paid by Capt. E.
J. Shelton on 30 Apr 1863, appears as 2nd Sgt., absent, left sick at Port Hudson 6 May 1863.
Roll dated Jul - Aug 1863: last paid by Capt. E. J. Shelton on 30 Apr 1863, absent, same as last
muster. Roll dated Sep - Oct 1863: absent, same as last muster.
R. J. Pirtle appears on a receipt roll for clothing for 3rd Quarter of 1863, issued on 8 Jul 1863.
R. J. Pirtle, Sgt. Co. B, appears as signature on a Roll of Prisoners of War paroled at New
Orleans; captured at Lafouche, LA on 23 Jun 1863.
R. J. Pirtle, Sgt., Co. B, 1st Regt. Texas Sharp Shooters, appears on a List of prisoners sent down
from Port Hudson, La., list dated Provost Marshall General's Office, New Orleans, La., 15 Jun
1863; date of capture 12 Jun 1863, remarks: 'deserter.'
May 24, 1999
©Ron Brothers and Billie Galyean Brown, 1999, All Rights Reserved.
Return to 1st Texas Sharp Shooters Biography Page Return to 1st Texas Sharp Shooters Main Page